|Nkemcho Ojeh *, Uma Gaur
Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados, West Indies
|Corresponding Author: Dr. Nkemcho Ojeh Lecturer in Molecular Biology and Genetics; Faculty of Medical Sciences The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus P.O. Box 64, Bridgetown BB 11000, St. Michael, Barbados, West Indies Phone numbers: 1246-417-4696 | Facsimile numbers: 1246-438-9170 Email: [email protected]|
|Related article at Pubmed, Scholar Google|
Background: Healthcare providers have faced potentially lethal infection risks throughout history but HIV/AIDS has motivated doctors and healthcare workers to address occupational health risks. Exposure to blood-borne diseases during clinical training of medical students raises medical, legal, ethical and professional issues. Students and house officers are at greater risk of sustaining blood-borne disease exposure as they are inexperienced in handling equipment used in minor clinical procedures. A higher risk is involved while handling HIV/AIDS patients.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to examine the knowledge, attitude and risk perception of first year medical students in Barbados to HIV/AIDS.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among first year medical students to assess their awareness of the disease and its prevention. In a classroom setting, a questionnaire eliciting information about the etiopathogenesis of the disease, precautions to be taken in handling HIV/AIDS patients, disinfection and post exposure prophylaxis was circulated.
Results: The response analyses showed that majority of students (70.7% - 96.7%) were aware of the etiopathogenesis, mode of transmission and precautions of HIV/AIDS. Few students (4% - 10%) knew how the virus could be deactivated and the types of high-level disinfectant agents used. Most (60.7% - 86.7%) knew the correct methods for collection and transportation of blood samples. None were aware of the exact management and notification of accidental exposure. Willingness to work with HIV/AIDS patients was reduced to 22.7% but increased to 30% if proper training was provided. Few students (10%) were aware of the ‘universal precautions”. All students were aware of the concept of safe sex.
Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for a training programme in “universal precautions” for medical students to help minimize the risk and improve knowledge, skill and competency in treating HIV/AIDS patients before they reach their clinical years.
|Medical students, HIV, AIDS, universal precautions, safe sex|
|In the Caribbean, HIV/AIDS, the most dreaded infection of the 21st century, is the leading cause of death in the 19 to 49 year age group. 330,000 out of a mere 24 million inhabitants of this region are living with HIV/AIDS.1|
|Healthcare providers have faced potentially lethal infection risks throughout history but HIV/AIDS has motivated doctors and other healthcare workers to address their occupational health risk with a greater intensity.2,3|
|The HIV retrovirus undergoes rapid mutation making it impossible to prepare an effective vaccine. The mode of transmission is through sexual intercourse and the disease is spread from human to human via blood and body fluids.4 The best way to minimize the spread of this infection is by educating people.|
|Young medical students just completing their pre-clinical training are exposed to patients and are expected to perform minor bed side, surgical procedures where they are likely to get exposed to infective clinical waste, blood products or accidental injuries by sharp instruments during these clinical postings. Both they and house officers therefore face a greater risk of acquiring this blood-borne disease. Coupled to this, the rate at which HIV positive cases are increasing is becoming more of a threat to medical students, healthcare workers and the government. Reports have already shown that healthcare providers have a 0.3% risk of acquiring HIV following a contaminated needle stick injury.5,6 Accidental exposure to blood-borne diseases during clinical training of medical students therefore raises medical, legal, ethical and professional issues for students, faculty and administrators.|
|A large number of accidental exposures to infected clinical material and procedure can be prevented through knowledgeable handling of sharp instruments and blood products. Therefore, the concept of “universal precautions” was introduced by the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) which is a set of guidelines that aim to protect people working in health care from blood-borne infections.7|
|The aim of the present study was to examine the general awareness of first year medical students in Barbados to HIV/AIDS. In particular, knowledge, attitude and risk perception of the medical students was assessed using a cross-sectional survey.|
Material and Methods
|Study Design, Setting, Participants and Data Collection|
|The present study is an anonymous random cross-sectional survey which was done among the first year medical students at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados in 2012. The study aims were explained to the students and verbal consents were obtained from them. They were advised that participation in the survey was anonymous and voluntary. They were also informed that gender and age would be the only personal information required.|
|A questionnaire containing fifteen items was circulated in a classroom setting. The students were given 45 minutes to complete the questionnaire which included factual questions to identify and assess their awareness about HIV/AIDS. Information was elicited about the etiopathogenesis of the disease, precautions to be taken in handling the patients, disinfection and post exposure prophylaxis. The contents of the questionnaire are listed in Table 1. The correct response for each item, obtained from the general literature and World Health Organization (W.H.O.) guidelines are shown in the shaded boxes in Tables 2 and 3.|
|The data collected from the medical students were compiled and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18.0.|
|The total number of respondents was 150 within the age group of 18 to 22 years. Majority of the students were females (83%) and 17% were males. he data analyses showed that majority of students were aware of the etiopathogenesis of the disease (Table 2). 96.7% of respondents indicated correctly that the causative agent was a virus. 1.3% of the population believed that a bacteria or fungus were the causative agents of HIV whereas 0.7% indicated that a protozoa was the causative agent. 90% of the students were correct and indicated that the disease symptoms were presented as repeated infections. Diarrhea (4%), convulsions (2%) and vertigo (2.7%) were also listed as symptoms presented. 1.3% did not respond to the item. The majority of respondents (70.7%) rightly believed that the virus attacked white blood cells whereas 14% believed red blood cells were attacked. 4% believed platelets were attacked and 1.3% thought nerve cells were attacked. 10% of students did not respond to the item. Regarding systems involved, 92.7% indicated correctly in their responses that the immune system was the major system affected whereas 4% believed it to be the musculoskeletal system, 2% the vascular system and 1.3% the nervous system. Regarding the transmission of infection, 90% students rightly believed that the infection was commonly transmitted by sexual intercourse. Few students had misconceptions about the mode of disease transmission with 4% thinking that the disease could be spread by sharing utensils, 2.7% by shaking hands with infected persons and 2% by using public toilets. 1.3% did not respond. Item 6 pertained to infected clinical material responsible for transmission of infection. According to 90% respondents, infection spread faster through infected blood transfusion and blood products and this was the correct response. In comparison, few students believed that other bodily excreted material spread the infection faster such as stool indicated by 2.7%, saliva indicated by 2% and sweat indicated by 4% of the student population. Few students (1.3%) did not respond to this item (Table 2).|
|Data obtained for the responses to the sterilization and disinfection section of the questionnaire is shown in Table 3. In general, a wide variety of responses in this area was observed. 26% students indicated that the virus can be inactivated by boiling instruments and the time required for this was 60 minutes, 26% believed it took 40 minutes, 32% believed it took 10 minutes and only 4% answered correctly that it took 20 minutes. 12% of individuals failed to respond. It was noted that the chemical agents used as high-level disinfectants to inactivate the virus were glutaraldehyde as answered correctly by 10% of students, chlorine (30.7%), sodium hypochlorite (30.7%) and benzene (8%). 20.6% of students failed to respond.|
|Results obtained for the collection and transportation of blood samples are shown in Table 3. Respondents had varying concepts regarding the use of gloves while handling body fluids and collecting blood samples from a patient. 86.7% of students were correct and indicated the need for gloves to be used whereas 5.3% felt that gloves were not required. 8% did not respond to this item.|
|On the item of transporting samples to the laboratory (Table 3), the majority of students (60.7%) were right and indicated that using disposable screw capped bottles in a closed container was the best way of transporting blood samples to the laboratory. 22% thought an ordinary rubber bottle was sufficient, 12% felt bottles with screw caps were adequate whereas 1.3% indicated that using disposable screw capped bottles in an open container was the best method of sample transportation to the laboratory. 4% of students failed to respond.|
|The data collected for the responses on the section on needle disposal and accidental needle stick injury is shown in Table 3. Regarding disposal of used needles, 52% of students chose the right answer indicating that uncapped needles should be placed in a puncture resistant container as a disposal method. 24.7% respondents suggested that the needle should be destroyed after use. A few students (12%) indicated that the needle should be recapped before disposal, 2% suggested that the needle can be re-used after boiling. 9.3% did not respond.|
|In the case of accidental exposure to body fluids or injury by needle or sharp instruments, the correct protocol was to wash the exposed area with soap and water and then notify a senior doctor and the higher authorities. 60% of respondents suggested washing the wound with soap and water only, 30.7% indicated getting a blood test for HIV infection only. 9.3% did not respond. None of the respondents were aware about notification to the senior doctor or higher authorities in case of accidental exposure to body fluids or needle stick injury (Table 3).|
|Regarding the concept of safe sex, 100% of respondents agreed to the use of condoms with a single partner which was the correct response (Table 3). The willingness to treat HIV/AIDS patients was however low (Table 4). Only 22.7% were ready to handle HIV/AIDS patients. If adequate training was provided during pre-clinical years, then willingness increased to 30%. 10% of students agreed that there should be insurance coverage and adequate compensation in case of acquiring infection as an occupational hazard. On the item of universal precautions, only 10% of respondents were aware of this.|
|The present study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude and risk perception of medical students in Barbados to HIV and AIDS. An anonymous cross-sectional survey was carried out among first year medical students. The purpose of the study was explained to the students to minimize any apprehension. The group of respondents ranged between the age group 18 to 22 years. It was established that the major source of their information was gained through the medical curriculum as well as social media and online technology.|
|Regarding the transmission of infection, a subset of students had misconceptions about the mode of disease transmission thinking that the disease could be spread by sharing utensils, by shaking hands with infected persons or by using public toilets. These results indicate the importance of getting over the misconceptions, myths and stigma that have been reported previously amongst students in various health disciplines.8-10 A teaching curriculum containing comprehensive information about HIV/AIDS and associated medical, ethical and legal issues will be beneficial in alleviating these negative attitudes and thus assist in improving the health care system.|
|In the present study, the first year medical students had varying concepts regarding the use of gloves while handling body fluids and collecting blood samples from a patient however, 86.7% of them indicated that gloves should be used while handling body fluids and collecting blood samples from a patient. According to a study conducted by Diekema and group11, 95-99% students agreed to use gloves while handling blood and body fluids. Overall, their findings are similar to ours in that only 5.3% of our students felt that the use of gloves was not required.|
|An interesting observation made in the present study was that none of the students were aware about notification to the senior doctor or higher authorities in case of accidental exposure to body fluids or needle stick injury. In another study, 47 students received needle stick injury but only 14 students reported the incident to a senior consultant.12 According to a study by Norsayani and Noor Hassim13 the numbers of episodes of needle stick injury decreased with proper use of universal precautions. The group also reported that medical students faced a higher risk of needle stick injury. As the incidence of contracting AIDS is 0.4% in the case of needle stick injury,14 this highlights the need for adequate training sessions about universal precautions to be put in place before students assume their clinical postings. Appropriate post exposure prophylaxis is an integral part of prevention, control and work place safety. In the present study, none of the students were aware of the necessary post exposure management and prophylaxis. These findings are in agreement with those by Esin and co-workers15 who reported that knowledge of post exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection was very low. About 62% doctors knew about the post exposure prophylaxis policy in the hospital. The same study indicated that 90% candidates did not know about the seroconversion following a needle stick injury. We recommend that along with adequate training sessions, medical students should be offered free blood tests up to 12 weeks as seroconversion is reported up to 12 weeks after accidental exposure.16 We also recommend that student counselors be available for students seeking advice. Putting these strategies in place may help to alleviate any anxiety or apprehension experienced by medical students dealing with HIV/AIDS patients.|
|In the present study, the willingness to treat HIV/AIDS patients was low; however, if adequate training was provided during pre-clinical years, then willingness increased thus indicating the need for a proper training session. Our findings are in alignment with the study by Diekema and group11 who also reported that willingness to handle HIV positive cases increased after a post training session.|
|Only a minority of students in our study were aware of universal precautions. Diekema and group11,17 observed that after a proper training session, knowledge about the universal precautions was much improved. However, Kwee and Ka'anehe18 stated that knowledge of universal precautions may not correlate with minimized risk of occupational exposure among medical students. Helfgott and group19 observed that knowledge about the universal precautions was 100% among the resident doctors of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, while overall compliance was only 89%. Based on our findings, we recommend that the teaching curriculum should have adequate coverage regarding universal precautions in order to increase knowledge in this area. Handlers should also be willing to apply these precautions.|
|Our study has provided information on the general awareness of first year medical students in Barbados to HIV/AIDS and highlights the need for early and relevant training commencing in the pre-clinical years. Further work is needed to elucidate the possible reasons behind the reduced willingness to work with HIV/AIDS patients. The potential findings from that study may help to put in place appropriate strategies and training that focuses on attitudes in working specifically with HIV/AIDS patients to help minimize related stigma and discrimination and to encourage a positive attitude and increase professionalism in the healthcare workforce. In conclusion, the devastating outcome of this global pandemic can be reduced by prevention of HIV/AIDS. This can only be achieved by educating our medical students, health care professionals and the general public.|
Conflict of Interest
|The authors declare no conflict of interest.|
|1. Landis RC. The Caribbean: riding the dark horse of HIV/AIDS towards a brighter future. Cytometry B ClinCytom. 2007;72(2):153-5.
2. Henderson DK. Management of needlestick injuries: a house officer who has a needlestick. JAMA.2012;307(1):75-84.
3. Reda AA, Fisseha S, Mengistie B, Vandeweerd JM. Standard precautions: occupational exposure and behavior of health care workers in Ethiopia. PLoS One 2010;5(12):e14420.
4. Fauci AS. AIDS: newer concepts in the immunopathogenic mechanisms of human immunodeficiency virus disease. ProcAssoc Am Physicians. 1995;107(1):1-7.
5. Hadadi A, Afhami S, Karbakhsh M, Esmailpour N. Occupational exposure to body fluids among healthcare workers: a report from Iran. Singapore Med J 2008;49(6):492-6.
6. Trim JC, Elliott TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies.J Hosp Infect. 2003;53(4):237-42.
Bennett G, Mansell I. Universal precautions: a survey of community nurses' experienceand practice. J ClinNurs2004;13(4):413-21.
8. Oyeyemi AY, Jasper US, Aliyu SU, Oyeyemiz AL. Knowledge and attitude of health professional students toward patients living with AIDS. Afr J Med MedSci 2012;41(4):365-71.
9. Chan KY, Yang Y, Li ZR, Stoove MA, Reidpath DD. Interrelationships between HIV/AIDS and risk behavior prejudice among medical students in Southern China. Curr HIV Res 2009;7(6):601-11.
10. Pickles D, King L, Belan I. Attitudes of nursing students towards caring for people with HIV/AIDS: thematic literature review. J AdvNurs2009;65(11):2262-73.
11. Diekema DJ, Schuldt SS, Albanese MA, Doebbeling BN. Universal precautions training of preclinical students: impact on knowledge, attitudes, and compliance. Prev Med 1995;24(6):580-5.
12. Saleem T, Khalid U, Ishaque S, Zafar A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical students regarding needle stick injuries. J Pak Med Assoc2010;60(2):151-6.
13. Norsayani MY, Noor Hassim I. Study on incidence of needle stick injury and factors associated with this problem among medical students. J Occup Health 2003;45(3):172-8.
14. Gerberding JL. Current epidemiologic evidence and case reports of occupationally acquired HIV and other bloodborne diseases. Infect Control HospEpidemiol1990;11(10 Suppl):558-60.
15. Esin IA, Alabi S, Ojo E, Ajape AA. Knowledge of human immunodeficiency virus post exposure prophylaxis among doctors in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Niger J ClinPract 2011;14(4):464-6.
16. Marcus R. Surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood from patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 1988;319(17):1118-23.
17. Diekema DJ, Albanese MA, Schuldt SS, Doebbeling BN. Blood and body fluid exposures during clinical training: relation to knowledge of universal precautions. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11(2):109-11.
18. Kwee SA, Ka'anehe L. Occupational exposures and knowledge of universal precautions among medical students. Hawaii Med J 1999;58(2):21-3.
19. Helfgott AW, Taylor-Burton J, Garcini FJ, Eriksen NL, Grimes R. Compliance with universal precautions: knowledge and behavior of residents and students in a department of obstetrics and gynecology. Infect Dis ObstetGynecol1998;6(3):123-8.
All Published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright © 2017 All rights reserved. iMedPub Last revised : November 23, 2017